Review



anti gitr agonist dta 1  (Bio X Cell)


Bioz Verified Symbol Bio X Cell is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol Bio X Cell manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 94

    Structured Review

    Bio X Cell anti gitr agonist dta 1
    Anti Gitr Agonist Dta 1, supplied by Bio X Cell, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 43 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/anti+gitr+agonist+dta+1/InVivoMAb+anti-mouse+GITR/pm41912896-476-16-19
    Average 94 stars, based on 43 article reviews
    anti gitr agonist dta 1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    94/100 stars

    Images

    Related Articles

    In Vivo:

    Article Title: Reinvigorating COTL1 high NK cells via GITR signalling overcomes immune checkpoint blockade resistance in tsMHC-I-impaired tumours.
    Article Snippet: NK cell and CD8+ T cell depletion was performed by the intraperitoneal injection of anti-Asialo-GM1 antibody (FUJIFILM Wako, 986-10001, 20 μl each for a single dose per mouse) and anti-CD8a antibody (BioXCell, BE0004-1, 100 μg each for a single dose per mouse) 24 h before tumour challenge, and after the challenge, the antibody was injected every 3 days. .. For in vivo treatments, mice were treated every 3 days by intraperitoneal injection of 100 μg anti-GITR agonist DTA-1 (BioXCell, BE0063), αPD-L1 (BioXCell, BE0101) and IgG control. .. Statistical analysis was performed using R (v4.1.0), Qupath (v0.5.0) and GraphPad Prism (v10) software.

    Injection:

    Article Title: Reinvigorating COTL1 high NK cells via GITR signalling overcomes immune checkpoint blockade resistance in tsMHC-I-impaired tumours.
    Article Snippet: NK cell and CD8+ T cell depletion was performed by the intraperitoneal injection of anti-Asialo-GM1 antibody (FUJIFILM Wako, 986-10001, 20 μl each for a single dose per mouse) and anti-CD8a antibody (BioXCell, BE0004-1, 100 μg each for a single dose per mouse) 24 h before tumour challenge, and after the challenge, the antibody was injected every 3 days. .. For in vivo treatments, mice were treated every 3 days by intraperitoneal injection of 100 μg anti-GITR agonist DTA-1 (BioXCell, BE0063), αPD-L1 (BioXCell, BE0101) and IgG control. .. Statistical analysis was performed using R (v4.1.0), Qupath (v0.5.0) and GraphPad Prism (v10) software.

    Control:

    Article Title: Reinvigorating COTL1 high NK cells via GITR signalling overcomes immune checkpoint blockade resistance in tsMHC-I-impaired tumours.
    Article Snippet: NK cell and CD8+ T cell depletion was performed by the intraperitoneal injection of anti-Asialo-GM1 antibody (FUJIFILM Wako, 986-10001, 20 μl each for a single dose per mouse) and anti-CD8a antibody (BioXCell, BE0004-1, 100 μg each for a single dose per mouse) 24 h before tumour challenge, and after the challenge, the antibody was injected every 3 days. .. For in vivo treatments, mice were treated every 3 days by intraperitoneal injection of 100 μg anti-GITR agonist DTA-1 (BioXCell, BE0063), αPD-L1 (BioXCell, BE0101) and IgG control. .. Statistical analysis was performed using R (v4.1.0), Qupath (v0.5.0) and GraphPad Prism (v10) software.



    Similar Products

    94
    Bio X Cell anti gitr agonist dta 1
    Anti Gitr Agonist Dta 1, supplied by Bio X Cell, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/anti+gitr+agonist+dta+1/InVivoMAb+anti-mouse+GITR/pm41912896-476-16-19
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    anti gitr agonist dta 1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    Bio X Cell agonistic gitr antibody dta 1
    Agonistic Gitr Antibody Dta 1, supplied by Bio X Cell, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/anti+gitr+agonist+dta+1/InVivoMAb+anti-mouse+GITR/pm35880612-57-18-22
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    agonistic gitr antibody dta 1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Merck & Co agonist anti-gitr (murinised dta-1) ab
    Agonist Anti Gitr (Murinised Dta 1) Ab, supplied by Merck & Co, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/anti+gitr+agonist+dta+1/agon+anti+gitr/pm26560753-48-11-16
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    agonist anti-gitr (murinised dta-1) ab - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Agenus Inc anti-gitr agonistic antibody (dta-1) gitr
    Anti Gitr Agonistic Antibody (Dta 1) Gitr, supplied by Agenus Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/anti+gitr+agonist+dta+1/anti+gitr+agonistic+antibody++dta+1++gitr/pm26482147-234-5-26
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    anti-gitr agonistic antibody (dta-1) gitr - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Thermo Fisher agonistic rat anti-mouse gitr antibody dta-1
    Agonistic Rat Anti Mouse Gitr Antibody Dta 1, supplied by Thermo Fisher, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/anti+gitr+agonist+dta+1/anti+gitr+dta+1/us09228016-2071-0-12
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    agonistic rat anti-mouse gitr antibody dta-1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    R&D Systems agonist anti-gitr antibody dta-1
    Naive CD4 + T cells were FACS sorted from WT B6 ( a , b ) and OT-II ( c , d ) Foxp3gfp reporter mice and activated under iTreg-polarizing conditions. Anti-GITR agonistic antibody <t>(DTA-1,</t> 10 μg ml −1 ) or His-GITR Ligand (200 ng ml −1 , along with anti-His mAb) were used to ligate the GITR receptor on activated CD4 + T cells. Three days later, cells were harvested and analysed for Foxp3 and cytokines expression by flow cytometry. ( a , c ) Colour FACS plots depicting Foxp3- and IL-9-producing cells. Numbers in the quadrants indicate the percentage of cells. Data are representative of five independent experiments. ( b , d ) DTA-1 titrations and their impact on induction of Foxp3 + Tregs and Th9 cells, and graphs depict the percentage of cells that express Foxp3 (left) or IL-9 (right). Data are pooled from five independent experiments with triplicate cultures. ( e ) Expression of other cytokines, as indicated in the x axis, by WT naive CD4 + T cells polarized under iTreg conditions for 3 days with or without GITR ligation. Data are representative of three independent experiments.
    Agonist Anti Gitr Antibody Dta 1, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/anti+gitr+agonist+dta+1/biotinylated+anti+mouse+gitr++dta+1/pmc04570275-153-9-31
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    agonist anti-gitr antibody dta-1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    BioExpress gitr antibody rat anti-mouse gitr agonistic (dta-1) purified antibody
    Naive CD4 + T cells were FACS sorted from WT B6 ( a , b ) and OT-II ( c , d ) Foxp3gfp reporter mice and activated under iTreg-polarizing conditions. Anti-GITR agonistic antibody <t>(DTA-1,</t> 10 μg ml −1 ) or His-GITR Ligand (200 ng ml −1 , along with anti-His mAb) were used to ligate the GITR receptor on activated CD4 + T cells. Three days later, cells were harvested and analysed for Foxp3 and cytokines expression by flow cytometry. ( a , c ) Colour FACS plots depicting Foxp3- and IL-9-producing cells. Numbers in the quadrants indicate the percentage of cells. Data are representative of five independent experiments. ( b , d ) DTA-1 titrations and their impact on induction of Foxp3 + Tregs and Th9 cells, and graphs depict the percentage of cells that express Foxp3 (left) or IL-9 (right). Data are pooled from five independent experiments with triplicate cultures. ( e ) Expression of other cytokines, as indicated in the x axis, by WT naive CD4 + T cells polarized under iTreg conditions for 3 days with or without GITR ligation. Data are representative of three independent experiments.
    Gitr Antibody Rat Anti Mouse Gitr Agonistic (Dta 1) Purified Antibody, supplied by BioExpress, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/anti+gitr+agonist+dta+1/rat+anti+mouse+gitr+agonistic++dta+1++purified+antibody/pmc02518883-72-0-12
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    gitr antibody rat anti-mouse gitr agonistic (dta-1) purified antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    BioExpress rat anti-mouse gitr agonistic (dta-1) purified antibody
    Naive CD4 + T cells were FACS sorted from WT B6 ( a , b ) and OT-II ( c , d ) Foxp3gfp reporter mice and activated under iTreg-polarizing conditions. Anti-GITR agonistic antibody <t>(DTA-1,</t> 10 μg ml −1 ) or His-GITR Ligand (200 ng ml −1 , along with anti-His mAb) were used to ligate the GITR receptor on activated CD4 + T cells. Three days later, cells were harvested and analysed for Foxp3 and cytokines expression by flow cytometry. ( a , c ) Colour FACS plots depicting Foxp3- and IL-9-producing cells. Numbers in the quadrants indicate the percentage of cells. Data are representative of five independent experiments. ( b , d ) DTA-1 titrations and their impact on induction of Foxp3 + Tregs and Th9 cells, and graphs depict the percentage of cells that express Foxp3 (left) or IL-9 (right). Data are pooled from five independent experiments with triplicate cultures. ( e ) Expression of other cytokines, as indicated in the x axis, by WT naive CD4 + T cells polarized under iTreg conditions for 3 days with or without GITR ligation. Data are representative of three independent experiments.
    Rat Anti Mouse Gitr Agonistic (Dta 1) Purified Antibody, supplied by BioExpress, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/anti+gitr+agonist+dta+1/rat+anti+mouse+gitr+agonistic++dta+1++purified+antibody/pmc02518883-125-0-10
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    rat anti-mouse gitr agonistic (dta-1) purified antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Naive CD4 + T cells were FACS sorted from WT B6 ( a , b ) and OT-II ( c , d ) Foxp3gfp reporter mice and activated under iTreg-polarizing conditions. Anti-GITR agonistic antibody (DTA-1, 10 μg ml −1 ) or His-GITR Ligand (200 ng ml −1 , along with anti-His mAb) were used to ligate the GITR receptor on activated CD4 + T cells. Three days later, cells were harvested and analysed for Foxp3 and cytokines expression by flow cytometry. ( a , c ) Colour FACS plots depicting Foxp3- and IL-9-producing cells. Numbers in the quadrants indicate the percentage of cells. Data are representative of five independent experiments. ( b , d ) DTA-1 titrations and their impact on induction of Foxp3 + Tregs and Th9 cells, and graphs depict the percentage of cells that express Foxp3 (left) or IL-9 (right). Data are pooled from five independent experiments with triplicate cultures. ( e ) Expression of other cytokines, as indicated in the x axis, by WT naive CD4 + T cells polarized under iTreg conditions for 3 days with or without GITR ligation. Data are representative of three independent experiments.

    Journal: Nature Communications

    Article Title: GITR subverts Foxp3 + Tregs to boost Th9 immunity through regulation of histone acetylation

    doi: 10.1038/ncomms9266

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Naive CD4 + T cells were FACS sorted from WT B6 ( a , b ) and OT-II ( c , d ) Foxp3gfp reporter mice and activated under iTreg-polarizing conditions. Anti-GITR agonistic antibody (DTA-1, 10 μg ml −1 ) or His-GITR Ligand (200 ng ml −1 , along with anti-His mAb) were used to ligate the GITR receptor on activated CD4 + T cells. Three days later, cells were harvested and analysed for Foxp3 and cytokines expression by flow cytometry. ( a , c ) Colour FACS plots depicting Foxp3- and IL-9-producing cells. Numbers in the quadrants indicate the percentage of cells. Data are representative of five independent experiments. ( b , d ) DTA-1 titrations and their impact on induction of Foxp3 + Tregs and Th9 cells, and graphs depict the percentage of cells that express Foxp3 (left) or IL-9 (right). Data are pooled from five independent experiments with triplicate cultures. ( e ) Expression of other cytokines, as indicated in the x axis, by WT naive CD4 + T cells polarized under iTreg conditions for 3 days with or without GITR ligation. Data are representative of three independent experiments.

    Article Snippet: To deliver GITR costimulation to activated T cells, an agonist anti-GITR antibody DTA-1 (10 μg ml −1 ) or a His-tagged recombinant mouse GITR Ligand (200 ng ml −1 ) (2177-GL-025, R&D Systems) were added into the cultures, and in the case of His-tagged GITRL, anti-His mAb (10 μg/ml, MAB050, R&D Systems) were used to cross-link surface bound GITRL.

    Techniques: Expressing, Flow Cytometry, Ligation

    ( a ) Immunoblot analysis of total and phosphorylated (p-) Smad2, Smad3 and Stat5 in the cytosol and nucleus in WT B6 naive CD4 + T cells left untreated (d0) or activated for 1 to 3 days under iTreg-polarizing conditions with DTA-1 or control IgG. β-actin and Histone 3 (H3) serve as loading controls, respectively. Plots shown are representative data of 3 experiments. ( b ) ChIP assays for Smad3 in Foxp3 CNS1 and Il9 promoter regions in WT naive CD4 + T cells activated as in a . IgG serves as immunoprecipitation control. Values are presented as relative binding based on normalization to input DNA. Data represent mean values±s.d. ( n =3). ( c , d ) ChIP assays for H3Ac, H3K27Ac, H3K9Ac, H4Ac, H3K9Me2, H3K9Me3, H3K27Me2 and H3K27Me3 modifications in Foxp3 ( c ) and Il9 ( d ) loci in WT naive CD4 + T cells activated as in ( b ) for 2 days. Data represent mean values±s.d. ( n =3). ( e , f ) Flow cytometry analysis of Foxp3 expression in WT naive CD4 + T cells activated as in ( b ) for 3 days in the presence or absence of HDAC inhibitor sodium butyrate (NaB, 250 μg ml −1 ). Numbers in the quadrants indicate the percentage of Foxp3 + cells ( e ). ( f ) The graph represents Mean±s.d. of Foxp3 + T cells from five experiments with triplicate cultures. P values were determined by Student's t -test (* P <0.05).

    Journal: Nature Communications

    Article Title: GITR subverts Foxp3 + Tregs to boost Th9 immunity through regulation of histone acetylation

    doi: 10.1038/ncomms9266

    Figure Lengend Snippet: ( a ) Immunoblot analysis of total and phosphorylated (p-) Smad2, Smad3 and Stat5 in the cytosol and nucleus in WT B6 naive CD4 + T cells left untreated (d0) or activated for 1 to 3 days under iTreg-polarizing conditions with DTA-1 or control IgG. β-actin and Histone 3 (H3) serve as loading controls, respectively. Plots shown are representative data of 3 experiments. ( b ) ChIP assays for Smad3 in Foxp3 CNS1 and Il9 promoter regions in WT naive CD4 + T cells activated as in a . IgG serves as immunoprecipitation control. Values are presented as relative binding based on normalization to input DNA. Data represent mean values±s.d. ( n =3). ( c , d ) ChIP assays for H3Ac, H3K27Ac, H3K9Ac, H4Ac, H3K9Me2, H3K9Me3, H3K27Me2 and H3K27Me3 modifications in Foxp3 ( c ) and Il9 ( d ) loci in WT naive CD4 + T cells activated as in ( b ) for 2 days. Data represent mean values±s.d. ( n =3). ( e , f ) Flow cytometry analysis of Foxp3 expression in WT naive CD4 + T cells activated as in ( b ) for 3 days in the presence or absence of HDAC inhibitor sodium butyrate (NaB, 250 μg ml −1 ). Numbers in the quadrants indicate the percentage of Foxp3 + cells ( e ). ( f ) The graph represents Mean±s.d. of Foxp3 + T cells from five experiments with triplicate cultures. P values were determined by Student's t -test (* P <0.05).

    Article Snippet: To deliver GITR costimulation to activated T cells, an agonist anti-GITR antibody DTA-1 (10 μg ml −1 ) or a His-tagged recombinant mouse GITR Ligand (200 ng ml −1 ) (2177-GL-025, R&D Systems) were added into the cultures, and in the case of His-tagged GITRL, anti-His mAb (10 μg/ml, MAB050, R&D Systems) were used to cross-link surface bound GITRL.

    Techniques: Western Blot, Immunoprecipitation, Binding Assay, Flow Cytometry, Expressing

    ( a ) Immunoblot analysis of the induction of the canonical (p50, RelA) and non-canonical (p52, RelB) NF-κB pathways in the cytosol and nucleus in WT B6 naive T cells activated for 1 to 3 days under iTreg-polarizing conditions with DTA-1 or Ctrl IgG. Data are representative of three independent experiments. ( b , c ) Naive CD4 + T cells from WT B6, p50 −/− and p52 −/− mice were activated under iTreg conditions, with or without GITR ligation for 3 days, and induction of Foxp3 + T cells and IL-9+ T cells was analysed by FACS and shown. Numbers in the quadrants indicate the percentage of cells. ( c ) Graphs depict Mean±s.d. of five experiments with triplicate cultures. ( d , e ) ChIP analysis of H3Ac and H4Ac modifications at Foxp3 ( d ) and Il9 ( e ) promoter and CNS regions from naive WT and p50 −/− CD4 + T cells, either left untreated (Unstim) or activated under iTreg-polarizing conditions for 2 days in the presence of DTA-1 or Ctrl IgG. Data represent mean values±s.d. ( n =3). P values were determined by Student's t -test (* P <0.05).

    Journal: Nature Communications

    Article Title: GITR subverts Foxp3 + Tregs to boost Th9 immunity through regulation of histone acetylation

    doi: 10.1038/ncomms9266

    Figure Lengend Snippet: ( a ) Immunoblot analysis of the induction of the canonical (p50, RelA) and non-canonical (p52, RelB) NF-κB pathways in the cytosol and nucleus in WT B6 naive T cells activated for 1 to 3 days under iTreg-polarizing conditions with DTA-1 or Ctrl IgG. Data are representative of three independent experiments. ( b , c ) Naive CD4 + T cells from WT B6, p50 −/− and p52 −/− mice were activated under iTreg conditions, with or without GITR ligation for 3 days, and induction of Foxp3 + T cells and IL-9+ T cells was analysed by FACS and shown. Numbers in the quadrants indicate the percentage of cells. ( c ) Graphs depict Mean±s.d. of five experiments with triplicate cultures. ( d , e ) ChIP analysis of H3Ac and H4Ac modifications at Foxp3 ( d ) and Il9 ( e ) promoter and CNS regions from naive WT and p50 −/− CD4 + T cells, either left untreated (Unstim) or activated under iTreg-polarizing conditions for 2 days in the presence of DTA-1 or Ctrl IgG. Data represent mean values±s.d. ( n =3). P values were determined by Student's t -test (* P <0.05).

    Article Snippet: To deliver GITR costimulation to activated T cells, an agonist anti-GITR antibody DTA-1 (10 μg ml −1 ) or a His-tagged recombinant mouse GITR Ligand (200 ng ml −1 ) (2177-GL-025, R&D Systems) were added into the cultures, and in the case of His-tagged GITRL, anti-His mAb (10 μg/ml, MAB050, R&D Systems) were used to cross-link surface bound GITRL.

    Techniques: Western Blot, Ligation

    ( a ) Schematic diagram depicting Foxp3 locus structure and consensus κB binding sites (boxed) in the Foxp3 promoter and CNS1–2 regions. ( b ) ChIP analysis of p50 enrichment at the Foxp3 promoter and CNS1–2 sites in naive CD4 + cells left untreated (Unstim) or activated under iTreg-polarizing conditions in the presence of DTA-1. Data represent mean values±s.d. ( n =4). ( c ) Co-immunoprecipitation analysis of p50 in naive CD4 + T cells activated as in ( b ). Anti-p50 or control IgG immunoprecipitates (IP) were subjected to immunoblot analysis (IB) using anti-HDAC1 and anti-Sirt1 antibodies. Data are representative of three independent experiments. ( d ) ChIP analysis of HDAC1 binding to the Foxp3 promoter and CNS1–2 sites in naive CD4 + cells stimulated under iTreg-polarizing conditions in the presence of DTA-1 or IgG. Data represent mean values±s.d. ( n =3). ( e , f ) Flow cytometry analysis of Foxp3 expression in naive CD4 + T cells activated as in ( d ) for 3 days in the presence of HDAC1 inhibitor CI-994 (CI, 1 μM) or Sirt1 inhibitor EX-527 ( EX, 0.5 μM). Numbers in the quadrants indicate the percentage of Foxp3 + cells ( e ). ( f ) Plots shows mean±s.d. of Foxp3 + T cells from 3 experiments with duplicate culture. P values were determined by Student's t -test (* P <0.05).

    Journal: Nature Communications

    Article Title: GITR subverts Foxp3 + Tregs to boost Th9 immunity through regulation of histone acetylation

    doi: 10.1038/ncomms9266

    Figure Lengend Snippet: ( a ) Schematic diagram depicting Foxp3 locus structure and consensus κB binding sites (boxed) in the Foxp3 promoter and CNS1–2 regions. ( b ) ChIP analysis of p50 enrichment at the Foxp3 promoter and CNS1–2 sites in naive CD4 + cells left untreated (Unstim) or activated under iTreg-polarizing conditions in the presence of DTA-1. Data represent mean values±s.d. ( n =4). ( c ) Co-immunoprecipitation analysis of p50 in naive CD4 + T cells activated as in ( b ). Anti-p50 or control IgG immunoprecipitates (IP) were subjected to immunoblot analysis (IB) using anti-HDAC1 and anti-Sirt1 antibodies. Data are representative of three independent experiments. ( d ) ChIP analysis of HDAC1 binding to the Foxp3 promoter and CNS1–2 sites in naive CD4 + cells stimulated under iTreg-polarizing conditions in the presence of DTA-1 or IgG. Data represent mean values±s.d. ( n =3). ( e , f ) Flow cytometry analysis of Foxp3 expression in naive CD4 + T cells activated as in ( d ) for 3 days in the presence of HDAC1 inhibitor CI-994 (CI, 1 μM) or Sirt1 inhibitor EX-527 ( EX, 0.5 μM). Numbers in the quadrants indicate the percentage of Foxp3 + cells ( e ). ( f ) Plots shows mean±s.d. of Foxp3 + T cells from 3 experiments with duplicate culture. P values were determined by Student's t -test (* P <0.05).

    Article Snippet: To deliver GITR costimulation to activated T cells, an agonist anti-GITR antibody DTA-1 (10 μg ml −1 ) or a His-tagged recombinant mouse GITR Ligand (200 ng ml −1 ) (2177-GL-025, R&D Systems) were added into the cultures, and in the case of His-tagged GITRL, anti-His mAb (10 μg/ml, MAB050, R&D Systems) were used to cross-link surface bound GITRL.

    Techniques: Binding Assay, Immunoprecipitation, Western Blot, Flow Cytometry, Expressing

    ( a ) Graph depicting Il9 locus and putative Foxp3 binding sites (red) at the Il9 promoter and CNS regions. ( b ) ChIP analysis of Foxp3 binding to the Il9 gene locus in CD4 + T cells transduced with retrovirus expressing GFP alone (Ctrl) or GFP-Flag-Foxp3 (Foxp3), then cultured under iTreg-polarizing conditions in the presence of DTA-1. GFP + cells were sorted and fixed for ChIP using anti-Flag antibody. Data represent mean values±s.d. ( n =3). ( c , d ) Flow cytometry plots showing IL-9-producing cells in CD4 + T cells transduced with retrovirus expressing GFP alone or Foxp3-GFP, and cultured under iTreg-polarizing conditions for 3 days in the presence of DTA-1. Numbers indicate the percentage of cells in the quadrants ( c ). Graph depicts the percentage of IL-9+ cells in GFP + population ( d ). Data represent mean values±s.d. ( n =6). ( e ) Co-immunoprecipitation of flag-foxp3 in CD4 + T cells transduced with retrovirus expressing flag-foxp3, and cultured under iTreg-polarizing conditions for 2 days. Anti-flag and control IgG immunoprecipitates (IP) were subjected to immunoblot analysis (IB) with anti-HDAC1, anti-HDAC2, anti-Sirt1 and anti-Sirt7 antibodies, and representative plots of 3 experiments are shown. ( f ) ChIP analysis of H3Ac and H4Ac modifications at Il9 promoter and CNS regions in GFP + cells sorted from naive CD4 + T cells transduced and activated as in ( b ) for 2 days. Data represent mean values±s.d. ( n =3). ( g , h ) Flow cytometry analysis of IL-9-producing cells in naive CD4 + T cells transduced and activated as in ( c ) for 3 days in the presence or absence of HDAC inhibitor Trichostatin A (TSA, 2 nM) and Sirt1 inhibitor EX-527 (EX, 0.5 μM). Numbers in the quadrants indicate the percentage of positive cells ( g ). Graph depicts the percentage of IL-9+ cells in GFP + population. Data represent mean values±s.d. ( n =9) ( h ). ( i ) ChIP analysis of H3Ac and H4Ac modifications at Il9 promoter and CNS regions in Foxp3 − GFP + cells sorted from naive CD4 + T cells transduced with retrovirus expressing Foxp3-GFP and cultured as in ( g ) for 2 days. Data represent mean values±s.d. ( n =3). P values were determined by Student's t -test (* P <0.05).

    Journal: Nature Communications

    Article Title: GITR subverts Foxp3 + Tregs to boost Th9 immunity through regulation of histone acetylation

    doi: 10.1038/ncomms9266

    Figure Lengend Snippet: ( a ) Graph depicting Il9 locus and putative Foxp3 binding sites (red) at the Il9 promoter and CNS regions. ( b ) ChIP analysis of Foxp3 binding to the Il9 gene locus in CD4 + T cells transduced with retrovirus expressing GFP alone (Ctrl) or GFP-Flag-Foxp3 (Foxp3), then cultured under iTreg-polarizing conditions in the presence of DTA-1. GFP + cells were sorted and fixed for ChIP using anti-Flag antibody. Data represent mean values±s.d. ( n =3). ( c , d ) Flow cytometry plots showing IL-9-producing cells in CD4 + T cells transduced with retrovirus expressing GFP alone or Foxp3-GFP, and cultured under iTreg-polarizing conditions for 3 days in the presence of DTA-1. Numbers indicate the percentage of cells in the quadrants ( c ). Graph depicts the percentage of IL-9+ cells in GFP + population ( d ). Data represent mean values±s.d. ( n =6). ( e ) Co-immunoprecipitation of flag-foxp3 in CD4 + T cells transduced with retrovirus expressing flag-foxp3, and cultured under iTreg-polarizing conditions for 2 days. Anti-flag and control IgG immunoprecipitates (IP) were subjected to immunoblot analysis (IB) with anti-HDAC1, anti-HDAC2, anti-Sirt1 and anti-Sirt7 antibodies, and representative plots of 3 experiments are shown. ( f ) ChIP analysis of H3Ac and H4Ac modifications at Il9 promoter and CNS regions in GFP + cells sorted from naive CD4 + T cells transduced and activated as in ( b ) for 2 days. Data represent mean values±s.d. ( n =3). ( g , h ) Flow cytometry analysis of IL-9-producing cells in naive CD4 + T cells transduced and activated as in ( c ) for 3 days in the presence or absence of HDAC inhibitor Trichostatin A (TSA, 2 nM) and Sirt1 inhibitor EX-527 (EX, 0.5 μM). Numbers in the quadrants indicate the percentage of positive cells ( g ). Graph depicts the percentage of IL-9+ cells in GFP + population. Data represent mean values±s.d. ( n =9) ( h ). ( i ) ChIP analysis of H3Ac and H4Ac modifications at Il9 promoter and CNS regions in Foxp3 − GFP + cells sorted from naive CD4 + T cells transduced with retrovirus expressing Foxp3-GFP and cultured as in ( g ) for 2 days. Data represent mean values±s.d. ( n =3). P values were determined by Student's t -test (* P <0.05).

    Article Snippet: To deliver GITR costimulation to activated T cells, an agonist anti-GITR antibody DTA-1 (10 μg ml −1 ) or a His-tagged recombinant mouse GITR Ligand (200 ng ml −1 ) (2177-GL-025, R&D Systems) were added into the cultures, and in the case of His-tagged GITRL, anti-His mAb (10 μg/ml, MAB050, R&D Systems) were used to cross-link surface bound GITRL.

    Techniques: Binding Assay, Transduction, Expressing, Cell Culture, Flow Cytometry, Immunoprecipitation, Western Blot

    ( a ) Immunoblot analysis of PU.1, IRF4, BATF, STAT6, and p-STAT6 in WT naive CD4 + T cells activated for 1 to 3 days under iTreg-polarizing conditions with DTA-1 or control IgG. Data shown are representative of two independent experiments. ( b ) Induction of Foxp3 + T cells and IL-9+ T cells from WT B6, Stat6 −/− , Spi1 −/− , Irf4 f/f Cd4-Cre, and Batf −/− CD4 + T cells activated under iTreg conditions for 3 days with or without GITR ligation. Numbers in the quadrants indicate the percentage of cells. Data are representative of five independent experiments. ( c ) Immunoblot analysis of STAT6 and p-STAT6 in WT B6 and p50 −/− naive CD4 + T cells activated for 1 to 2 days under iTreg-polarizing conditions with DTA-1 or Ctrl IgG. Data are representative of two independent experiments.

    Journal: Nature Communications

    Article Title: GITR subverts Foxp3 + Tregs to boost Th9 immunity through regulation of histone acetylation

    doi: 10.1038/ncomms9266

    Figure Lengend Snippet: ( a ) Immunoblot analysis of PU.1, IRF4, BATF, STAT6, and p-STAT6 in WT naive CD4 + T cells activated for 1 to 3 days under iTreg-polarizing conditions with DTA-1 or control IgG. Data shown are representative of two independent experiments. ( b ) Induction of Foxp3 + T cells and IL-9+ T cells from WT B6, Stat6 −/− , Spi1 −/− , Irf4 f/f Cd4-Cre, and Batf −/− CD4 + T cells activated under iTreg conditions for 3 days with or without GITR ligation. Numbers in the quadrants indicate the percentage of cells. Data are representative of five independent experiments. ( c ) Immunoblot analysis of STAT6 and p-STAT6 in WT B6 and p50 −/− naive CD4 + T cells activated for 1 to 2 days under iTreg-polarizing conditions with DTA-1 or Ctrl IgG. Data are representative of two independent experiments.

    Article Snippet: To deliver GITR costimulation to activated T cells, an agonist anti-GITR antibody DTA-1 (10 μg ml −1 ) or a His-tagged recombinant mouse GITR Ligand (200 ng ml −1 ) (2177-GL-025, R&D Systems) were added into the cultures, and in the case of His-tagged GITRL, anti-His mAb (10 μg/ml, MAB050, R&D Systems) were used to cross-link surface bound GITRL.

    Techniques: Western Blot, Ligation

    ( a ) Graph showing the Il9 locus and putative STAT6 binding sites at the Il9 promoter and CNS regions. ( b ) ChIP analysis of the binding of STAT6 to Il9 locus in WT B6 and Stat6 −/− naive CD4 + T cells activated under iTreg-polarizing conditions for 2 days in the presence of DTA-1 or control IgG. Data are representative of three independent experiments. ( c ) ChIP analysis of H3Ac and H4Ac modifications in Il9 promoter (top) and CNS regions (bottom) in WT B6 and Stat6 −/− naive CD4 + T cells activated as in ( b ) for 2 days. Data are representative of three independent experiments. ( d ) Co-immunoprecipitation analysis of STAT6 in WT B6 and Stat6 −/− naive CD4 + T cells activated as in ( b ). Anti-STAT6 immunoprecipitates (IP) were subjected to immunoblot analysis (IB) with anti-P300 and anti-STAT6 antibodies. Data are representative of three independent experiments. ( e ) ChIP analysis of p300 binding to the Il9 promoter and CNS in WT B6 and Stat6 −/− naive CD4 + T cells activated as in ( b ) for 2 days. Data are representative of three independent experiments. ( f , g ) Flow cytometry analysis of IL-9 and Foxp3 expression by WT B6 naive CD4 + T cells activated as in for 3 days in the presence or absence of p300/CBP inhibitor 1 (p300i-1, 4 μM) or p300 HAT activator (CTPB, 50 μM). Numbers in the quadrants indicate the percentage of cells ( f ). The graph represents Mean±s.d. of IL-9 + T cells from three independent experiments with triplicate cultures ( g ). P -values were determined by Student's t -test (* P <0.05).

    Journal: Nature Communications

    Article Title: GITR subverts Foxp3 + Tregs to boost Th9 immunity through regulation of histone acetylation

    doi: 10.1038/ncomms9266

    Figure Lengend Snippet: ( a ) Graph showing the Il9 locus and putative STAT6 binding sites at the Il9 promoter and CNS regions. ( b ) ChIP analysis of the binding of STAT6 to Il9 locus in WT B6 and Stat6 −/− naive CD4 + T cells activated under iTreg-polarizing conditions for 2 days in the presence of DTA-1 or control IgG. Data are representative of three independent experiments. ( c ) ChIP analysis of H3Ac and H4Ac modifications in Il9 promoter (top) and CNS regions (bottom) in WT B6 and Stat6 −/− naive CD4 + T cells activated as in ( b ) for 2 days. Data are representative of three independent experiments. ( d ) Co-immunoprecipitation analysis of STAT6 in WT B6 and Stat6 −/− naive CD4 + T cells activated as in ( b ). Anti-STAT6 immunoprecipitates (IP) were subjected to immunoblot analysis (IB) with anti-P300 and anti-STAT6 antibodies. Data are representative of three independent experiments. ( e ) ChIP analysis of p300 binding to the Il9 promoter and CNS in WT B6 and Stat6 −/− naive CD4 + T cells activated as in ( b ) for 2 days. Data are representative of three independent experiments. ( f , g ) Flow cytometry analysis of IL-9 and Foxp3 expression by WT B6 naive CD4 + T cells activated as in for 3 days in the presence or absence of p300/CBP inhibitor 1 (p300i-1, 4 μM) or p300 HAT activator (CTPB, 50 μM). Numbers in the quadrants indicate the percentage of cells ( f ). The graph represents Mean±s.d. of IL-9 + T cells from three independent experiments with triplicate cultures ( g ). P -values were determined by Student's t -test (* P <0.05).

    Article Snippet: To deliver GITR costimulation to activated T cells, an agonist anti-GITR antibody DTA-1 (10 μg ml −1 ) or a His-tagged recombinant mouse GITR Ligand (200 ng ml −1 ) (2177-GL-025, R&D Systems) were added into the cultures, and in the case of His-tagged GITRL, anti-His mAb (10 μg/ml, MAB050, R&D Systems) were used to cross-link surface bound GITRL.

    Techniques: Binding Assay, Immunoprecipitation, Western Blot, Flow Cytometry, Expressing

    ( a ) Rag1 −/− mice were injected with B16-OVA melanoma cells together with sorted CD4 + T cells from OT-II mice. The host mice were treated with 3 doses of DTA-1 (0.5 mg, i.p., n =14) or control IgG ( n =14) every five days starting from Day 5 after B16 inoculation. A cohort of anti-GITR treated Rag-1−/− mice ( n =7) was also given a neutralizing anti-IL-9 mAb (0.2 mg, i.p.). All animals were sacrificed on day 18 for analysis. ( b ) Numbers of tumor foci in the lungs from mice treated as in ( a ) (left panel). Representative images of the lungs of mice receiving different treatments (right panel). ( c ) Quantitative RT–PCR analysis of Foxp3, Il9, Il17a, IFNγ and Il4 mRNA from the lung infiltrating CD4 + cells. Data represent mean values±s.d. ( n =6). ( d ) Percentage of Foxp3 + (left) or IL-9 + (right) cells among the lung infiltrating CD4 + cells and in host spleen from control IgG and DTA treated mice as assessed by flow cytometry. Data represent mean values±s.d. ( n =6). P -values were determined by Student's t -test (* P <0.05).

    Journal: Nature Communications

    Article Title: GITR subverts Foxp3 + Tregs to boost Th9 immunity through regulation of histone acetylation

    doi: 10.1038/ncomms9266

    Figure Lengend Snippet: ( a ) Rag1 −/− mice were injected with B16-OVA melanoma cells together with sorted CD4 + T cells from OT-II mice. The host mice were treated with 3 doses of DTA-1 (0.5 mg, i.p., n =14) or control IgG ( n =14) every five days starting from Day 5 after B16 inoculation. A cohort of anti-GITR treated Rag-1−/− mice ( n =7) was also given a neutralizing anti-IL-9 mAb (0.2 mg, i.p.). All animals were sacrificed on day 18 for analysis. ( b ) Numbers of tumor foci in the lungs from mice treated as in ( a ) (left panel). Representative images of the lungs of mice receiving different treatments (right panel). ( c ) Quantitative RT–PCR analysis of Foxp3, Il9, Il17a, IFNγ and Il4 mRNA from the lung infiltrating CD4 + cells. Data represent mean values±s.d. ( n =6). ( d ) Percentage of Foxp3 + (left) or IL-9 + (right) cells among the lung infiltrating CD4 + cells and in host spleen from control IgG and DTA treated mice as assessed by flow cytometry. Data represent mean values±s.d. ( n =6). P -values were determined by Student's t -test (* P <0.05).

    Article Snippet: To deliver GITR costimulation to activated T cells, an agonist anti-GITR antibody DTA-1 (10 μg ml −1 ) or a His-tagged recombinant mouse GITR Ligand (200 ng ml −1 ) (2177-GL-025, R&D Systems) were added into the cultures, and in the case of His-tagged GITRL, anti-His mAb (10 μg/ml, MAB050, R&D Systems) were used to cross-link surface bound GITRL.

    Techniques: Injection, Quantitative RT-PCR, Flow Cytometry